Income is money you earn from an investment you have made or work that you have done.
Active income is money that you earn on a one to one basis, in other words, one unit of work earns one unit of money. So, one month of employment earns you one month’s salary. The next month you start again and there is no end in sight because you always start each new payment cycle at R0. This makes you very dependent on your job – you are always just one notice period (a month usually) away from trouble should that job cease. No employee is so indispensable as to be immune from this insecurity.
Passive income is the term used when the money keeps coming in even after you have stopped working for it. One unit of work leads to many units of payment – possibly infinite. Put differently, it is when you work once but continue to get paid over and over again for work you’re no longer doing.
Passive income brings financial freedom with real financial security, because you are not dependent on a boss and a job that may at any time decide they can do without you.
What is financial independence?
Financial independence means freedom from the need to have to work.
It can occur in varying degrees from partial independence (when you can take a few hours off work) to complete financial freedom (where you no longer need to work at all).
The way to attain financial independence is through acquiring passive income.
Passive income is money that flows into your pocket and is largely independent of the number of hours worked.
It needs to be emphasized that there is really no such thing as complete passive income because every Rand of passive income must flow from some kind of work or effort in the first place.
For example, while rental income might seem to be passive income, the task of finding and investing in property, together with managing the tenant, filling in tax returns etc. is anything but passive! However, Wealth Creators are prepared to put in the time and energy because it still adds up to only a fraction of normal working hours, and gives real financial security.
The word 'passive' really means avoiding being paid by the hour.
Instead you seek to do some work today and leverage off it tomorrow.
This leverage is in the form of receiving multiple payments without the need to work again.
For example, if you invest in a property with a positive cash flow, then you hope that the work involved in finding and acquiring the property will create a positive income stream that will last until you sell the property.
Work now for a lifetime of return later – that’s what it’s all about!
Friday, August 3, 2007
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Why Rental Properties Outperform Shares
When I first began buying rental houses and commercial buildings, I could easily find properties that offered net un-leveraged rental yields of 14 to 24 percent.
Today it is different story in South Africa. With the huge growth in property prices the last eight years today’s rental properties yield four to eight percent (unless of cause you know where to find bargains such as www.propertyinvestments.co.za and with the Property Pro Investment method)
Many people will tell me that four to eight percent doesn’t seem like a great rate of return. But relative to shares, properties win hands down.
Let me explain why.
Why Rental Properties Outperform Shares
At present, the annual dividend (income) yield on the JSE shares barely reaches 3% percent.
If you follow the advice that says you must diversify across a broad variety of shares, you might achieve a yearly income of R30 000 (3 percent average yield) from a share portfolio valued at R1 million if you are lucky. In contrast, a million in property value would return a rental income (net of expenses) of R80,000 a year.
Lets say you need an income of R80 000 (the level a property can easily give you) per year this means you will have to eat into your share ness egg.
If you want to achieve this income with property – no problem.
So if this is your income level and you want to maintain this standard of income level you will have to eat into your share capital – whiles if you accumulated the R1 million in property you will have no problem. You will never deplete your capital like with shares.
So what’s the verdict?
Share income increases over time on condition the share price keeps on growing.
Rental income also increases because it is indexed against inflation..
So if history is any indicator, it is clear that you will achieve an extremely competitive yield, growth, and protection against inflation with rental property.
Today it is different story in South Africa. With the huge growth in property prices the last eight years today’s rental properties yield four to eight percent (unless of cause you know where to find bargains such as www.propertyinvestments.co.za and with the Property Pro Investment method)
Many people will tell me that four to eight percent doesn’t seem like a great rate of return. But relative to shares, properties win hands down.
Let me explain why.
Why Rental Properties Outperform Shares
At present, the annual dividend (income) yield on the JSE shares barely reaches 3% percent.
If you follow the advice that says you must diversify across a broad variety of shares, you might achieve a yearly income of R30 000 (3 percent average yield) from a share portfolio valued at R1 million if you are lucky. In contrast, a million in property value would return a rental income (net of expenses) of R80,000 a year.
Lets say you need an income of R80 000 (the level a property can easily give you) per year this means you will have to eat into your share ness egg.
If you want to achieve this income with property – no problem.
So if this is your income level and you want to maintain this standard of income level you will have to eat into your share capital – whiles if you accumulated the R1 million in property you will have no problem. You will never deplete your capital like with shares.
So what’s the verdict?
Share income increases over time on condition the share price keeps on growing.
Rental income also increases because it is indexed against inflation..
So if history is any indicator, it is clear that you will achieve an extremely competitive yield, growth, and protection against inflation with rental property.
How do you calculate the percent yield on a property investment?
You take rent collections, less all cash expenses and mortgage (bond) financing. You calculate this figure by dividing the price of the property into its net income; e.g., R10,000/R100,000 = 10 percent yield.
Tuesday, July 3, 2007
With the NCA now in effect – is buying investment properties more or less attractive?
The NCA is now in effect.
This seems to be good news for property investors because it turns a sellers market into a buyers market? But conventional wisdom says to do the opposite of what the market dictates.
So does this mean buying is less attractive now?
Brendon
This seems to be good news for property investors because it turns a sellers market into a buyers market? But conventional wisdom says to do the opposite of what the market dictates.
So does this mean buying is less attractive now?
Brendon
Monday, July 2, 2007
What happens if the property market goes into a recession?
With the new National Credit Act and the last couple of interest rate hikes what will happen to our property investments?
Edward Smit
Edward Smit
Sunday, July 1, 2007
How will the new National Credit Act’s 30% rule effects investment property?
What about the new "National Credit Act" and its effect on banks - it looks to me that the banks are going to be much more strict in supplying bonds to people like us (you and your students) who want to buy more than just the property that they're living in?
What about their rule about not spending more than 30% (I think that's their figure) of household income on bond repayment?
In the past this wasn't strictly applied, but this new act forces the banks to be more strict and rigid!
Jacques Fourie
What about their rule about not spending more than 30% (I think that's their figure) of household income on bond repayment?
In the past this wasn't strictly applied, but this new act forces the banks to be more strict and rigid!
Jacques Fourie
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
